Reviewer Guidelines

Reviewer Guidelines:

• The journal follows a solid policy of arbitration (double blind). This process assists the editorial board in making decisions and may assist the author to fine-tune and improve the research.

• The referee’s commitment to the journal’s specialization (law and technology) is taken into consideration, and he must review the literature to exclude what is not within the journal’s jurisdiction, as well as exclude the literature that deals with political, religious, security or other matters, which is prohibited by the magazine.

• Any arbitrator who feels embarrassed in reviewing the author, for any reason whatsoever, notifies the editor-in-chief and withdraw from the arbitration process.

• All arbitrators must strictly adhere to the standards of confidentiality and scientific honesty for reviewing the literature, and not to announce, disclose or discuss it with others without permission from the editor in chief.

• The literature sent to the arbitrator is considered his trust, and he may not use any information or data obtained from the author for personal purposes.

• The arbitrator should take into account the review of the author objectively, impartially and impartially, and he must express his point of view clearly supported by the arguments in favor of that, and he should refrain from accepting the author whenever he feels embarrassed or finds a conflict of interest.

• The arbitrator shall notify the editor in chief of the existence of suspicions of scientific plagiarism (scientific plagiarism) or when there is a great similarity or overlap between the author who is subject to review and any other published works of which he has knowledge.