إصدار

مجلد 5 عدد 2 (2025)

الذكاء الاصطناعي الأمن السيبراني

دور التقنيات المعاصرة في تعزيز التعاون القضائي الدولي

دراسة في ضوء القانون الدولي العام
https://doi.org/10.54873/jolets.v5i2.233
د. محمد أحمد زكريا شحاته
دكتوراه في القانون الدولي العام

Corresponding Author(s) : د. محمد أحمد زكريا شحاته

m.a.zakaria2030@gmail.com

مجلة القانون والتكنولوجيا , مجلد 5 عدد 2 (2025)

الملخص

This study elucidates the role of contemporary technologies in enabling international judicial cooperation in the domain of public international law. The study emphasizes artificial intelligence, blockchain, digital databases, and remote trial systems. Using analytical and comparative strategies, the study investigates significant international legal treaties-namely the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime-and analyzes how legal institutions implement these technologies. The study also contrasts physical models employed by the European Union and the United States. The study says that while new technologies boost digital speed and efficiency in judicial cooperation, they create challenges in digital sovereignty, privacy, and legal harmonization. Successful technology integration in international judicial cooperation involves flexible legal structures, coordination on a global scale, and access to digital infrastructure on an equal basis, concludes the study. The article gives suggestions on promoting technological adoption in an equitable way in accordance with global standards of law.

أحمد زكريا شحاته د. م. (2026). دور التقنيات المعاصرة في تعزيز التعاون القضائي الدولي: دراسة في ضوء القانون الدولي العام. مجلة القانون والتكنولوجيا, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.54873/jolets.v5i2.233
تنزيل الاقتباسات
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
المراجع
  1. Allouzi A, ‘Digital Justice and Its Impact on the Functioning of Procedural Rivalry in UAE Law’ (2024) 5 Research Journal in Advanced Humanities <https://royalliteglobal.com/advanced-humanities/article/view/1616> accessed 21 August 2025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.58256/4f8zyx55
  2. Bentley SV and others, ‘The Digital Divide in Action: How Experiences of Digital Technology Shape Future Relationships with Artificial Intelligence’ (2024) 4 AI and Ethics 901 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-024-00452-3
  3. Cervantes, I., & Pineau, E. (2013). Algunas Propuestas Para Una Futura Ley de Cooperación Jurídica Internacional En Materia Civil. 28, 91–106’ <https://repositorio.uam.es/handle/10486/664036>
  4. Clack CD, Bakshi VA and Braine L, ‘Smart Contract Templates: Foundations, Design Landscape and Research Directions’ (arXiv, 15 March 2017) <http://arxiv.org/abs/1608.00771> accessed 21 August 2025
  5. Colson R, ‘Comparing the Machineries of Extradition: Between Functional and Cultural Approaches’ (2024) 72 The American Journal of Comparative Law 528 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/avae030
  6. Congress Enacts the Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data (CLOUD) Act, Reshaping U.S. Law Governing Cross-Border Access to Data’ (2018) 112 American Journal of International Law 487 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2018.61
  7. ‘Council of Europe. 1st Report on the Application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the Judiciary: Based on Data in the CEPEJ’s Resource Centre on Cyberjustice and AI. Strasbourg: CEPEJ; 2025. Available from: Https://Rm.Coe.Int/Cepej-Aiab-2024-4rev5-En.../1680b49def’
  8. Daskal J, ‘Unpacking the CLOUD Act’ [2018] eucrim - The European Criminal Law Associations’ Forum <https://eucrim.eu/articles/unpacking-cloud-act/> accessed 21 August 2025
  9. Department of Law, Post-Graduate and Diploma, Kampala International University, Kampala, Uganda. and Owoche A Godswill, ‘Methods of Judicial Cooperation and the Procedure for Enforcement Under International Law; Identifying the Nexus between Theory and Practice’ (2024) 4 NEWPORT INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CURRENT RESEARCH IN HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES 80
  10. Methods of Judicial Cooperation and the Procedure for Enforcement Under International Law; Identifying the Nexus between Theory and Practice’ (2024) 4 NEWPORT INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CURRENT RESEARCH IN HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES 80 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59298/NIJCRHSS/2024/4.3.8088
  11. Fabri M, ‘From Court Automation to E-Justice and Beyond in Europe’ (2024) 15 International Journal for Court Administration 7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.640
  12. Funta R and Ondria P, ‘Data Protection in Law Enforcement and Judicial Cooperation in Criminal Matters’ (2021) 11 TalTech Journal of European Studies 148 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2021-0019
  13. Gascón Inchausti F, ‘The New Regulation on the Digitalisation of Judicial Cooperation in the European Union: Something Old, Something New, Something Borrowed and Something Blue’ (2023) 24 ERA Forum 535 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-024-00782-z
  14. Kaya M and Shahid H, ‘Cross-Border Data Flows and Digital Sovereignty: Legal Dilemmas in Transnational Governance’ (2025) 4 Interdisciplinary Studies in Society, Law, and Politics 219 DOI: https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.isslp.4.2.20
  15. Mariano R, Fahey D. How Smart Contracts Can Simplify Cross-Border Legal Cooperation. Journal of International Law and Technology. 2023;21(4):455–472.’
  16. Mik E, ‘Smart Contracts: Terminology, Technical Limitations and Real World Complexity’ (2017) 9 Law, Innovation and Technology 269 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2017.1378468
  17. OECD, Artificial Intelligence in Society (OECD 2019) <https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/artificial-intelligence-in-society_eedfee77-en.html> accessed 20 August 2025
  18. Onţanu EA, ‘E-Justice Governance in the EU’ in David Ramiro Troitiño (ed), E-Governance in the European Union (Springer Nature Switzerland 2024) <https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-56045-3_16> accessed 21 August 2025
  19. Orji UJ, ‘The African Union Convention on Cybersecurity: A Regional Response Towards Cyber Stability?’ (2018) 12 Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology 91 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5817/MUJLT2018-2-1
  20. Patil H and others, ‘Potential Applicability of Blockchain Technology in the Maintenance of Chain of Custody in Forensic Casework’ (2024) 14 Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences 12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41935-023-00383-w
  21. Power DJ, Heavin C and O’Connor Y, ‘Balancing Privacy Rights and Surveillance Analytics: A Decision Process Guide’ (2021) 4 Journal of Business Analytics 155 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2573234X.2021.1920856
  22. Rutherford M, ‘The CLOUD Act: Creating Executive Branch Monopoly Over Cross-Border Data Access’ [2019] SSRN Electronic Journal <https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=3508942> accessed 21 August 2025
  23. Tsai F-C, ‘The Application of Blockchain of Custody in Criminal Investigation Process’ (2021) 192 Procedia Computer Science 2779 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.09.048
  24. Velicogna M, ‘History of a Digital Institution in the Making: Observing More than 14 Years of e-CODEX, the European e-Justice System’ in François-Xavier De Vaujany, Kätlin Pulk and Pierre Labardin (eds), Historicity in Organization Studies (Springer Nature Switzerland 2025) <https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-88938-7_6> accessed 21 August 2025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-88938-7_6
  25. Wang J and others, ‘Effects of the Combination of Compression and Impregnation with Phenolic Resin on the Dimensional Stability of Chinese Fir Wood Cells’ [2022] SSRN Electronic Journal <https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=4005943> accessed 21 August 2025
  26. Council of Europe / UNODC. Traditional letters rogatory vs. Mutual Legal Assistance Treaties (MLATs). UNODC Organized Crime Module 11. – compared differences in reliance, speed, and formality of letters rogatory vs. MLATs.
  27. Council of Europe. European Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters. Strasbourg: Council of Europe; 1959. Available from: https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/treaty/030
  28. European Parliament and Council. Regulation (EU) 2023/2844 on the digitalisation of judicial cooperation and access to justice in cross-border civil, commercial and criminal matters. Official Journal of the European Union. 2023;L:2844:1–29. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/2844/oj
  29. European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation & eu LISA. Artificial intelligence supporting cross border cooperation in criminal justice. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the EU; 2022. doi:10.2857/364146. Available from: https://op.europa.eu/.../5d24156e-2a66-11ed-975d.
  30. UK Law Commission. Smart Legal Contracts: Advice to Government. 2021. Available from: https://www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/smart-contracts/
  31. United Nations. United Nations Convention against Corruption. New York: UN; 2004. Available from: https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/corruption/uncac.html
  32. United Nations. United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime and the Protocols Thereto. New York: UN; 2004. Available from: https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/organized-crime/intro/UNTOC.html
  33. UNODC. Model Treaty on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters. New York: UN; 1990. Available from: https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/legal-tools/model-treaties.html
Read More
الذاتية للمؤلف غير متاحة
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC
Share |
تنزيل هذا الملف
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 484 Download : 196

التنزيلات

بيانات التنزيل غير متوفرة بعد.