دور تقنيات الذكاء الاصطناعي فــي مرحلة اجراءات التحكيم الدولي

Abstract

Recent decades have witnessed rapid technological advancements on the international stage, contributing to the use of artificial intelligence (AI) as an innovative, tactical, and highly precise tool. This research aims to study the role of AI in this international direction from a legal perspective, analyzing the logical framework, the actual technological impact on judicial guarantees, and future challenges. It also proposes a strategic plan and strategy for enhancing the judiciary within this evolving context. The research seeks to establish international guidelines for a set of rules and mechanisms governing the administration of national judicial boundaries. These guidelines are characterized by their inherent features of secrecy, confidentiality, and privacy, yet they remain hidden. This approach does not conflict with AI; rather, it can be directly integrated with it in administration, provided that general legal principles, such as justice, the right to a defense, the right to competition, and the protection of litigants' rights, are upheld.

The research also demonstrates that AI in procedural matters includes intelligent evidence analysis, session management, document exchange, and legal translation. The application of these restrictions is based on guided procedures, diverse national laws, and specific international practical applications, with limitations on use including the human arbitrator's discretion regarding technical accuracy, data security, and confidentiality, except where otherwise specified.

Artificial intelligence plays a pivotal role in intelligent guided adversarial proceedings by managing sessions and schedules, exchanging documents and memoranda electronically, and improving translation organization, including creating multilingual communication without causing significant disruption. Furthermore, intelligent evidence analysis and big data (e-discovery) have enabled accurate assessment of the probative value of documents, resulting in procedural optimization and cost reduction. However, the final decision regarding the assessment and analysis rests with the human arbitrator and the integrity of the measures taken to adjudicate.